Posts

FOIA DOCS - AGENCY RETALIATION!

FOIA docs reveal direct Agency Retaliation within minutes once whistleblower disclosures, hostilities & gender-based discriminatory acts were submitted in-writing (10/24/14) by Ms. C… (Whistleblower). She submitted her report through Officer T… (Union Steward) due to Agency inaction, that failed to shield her from a hostile workplace since her first disclosures (9/16/14) via phone call. She immediately became the target by senior staffers while the allegations detailed in her written report were never communicated in FOIA docs. Then, her probationary end-date was provided to the Service Chief while a peer review was underway. Roles are depicted in parentheses.     ======================= -----Original Message----- From: S….., …… (Surgical Administrator) To: R……, ….. (HR/LR) Cc: H….., …… (Chief of Surgery) Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 4:10 PM Subject: this morning’s meeting Mark, We just received an Urgent Union Grievance from Ms. C… (Whistleblower). Can we talk agai
FOIA DOCS & EXCERPTS FROM SWORN STATEMENT RECAP: First protected whistleblower disclosures and EEO violations were made via call with the Service Chief and included: a hostile work environment alleged by Ms. C…(Whistleblower) perpetrated by Dr. J... (physician/surgeon). The phone call lasted 36 minutes. After the disclosures and within 10 days of said call, retaliation ensued by the Agency, the physician/surgeon, and administrative personnel, in order to execute the whistleblower’s dismissal from the Agency for reporting violations. Docs are in reverse chronological order . Employee roles have been inserted in parentheses for reader clarification. An opposing sworn statement by a departmental doctor, Ortho retired, denies the false allegations lodged by the Service Chief, the Chief of Surgery, and the physician/surgeon about Ms. C.... (Whistleblower) emailed on 9/26/14 (see other threads) sent to senior executives. Ortho retired was asked questions during a formal EEO investi

EXCERPTS FROM SWORN STATEMENT

======= Recap Part 1 : Excerpts from C's.... (Whistleblower's) AFGE Union Steward's sworn statement by Officer……..deposed in March 2016 citing EEO violations by the Agency and whistleblower protected disclosures reported to him by the complainant. Dates are approximated to be “on or about” by both the witness and the investigative authority. Titles of persons are noted in parentheses for reader clarification. ======= In November 2014, Dr. ....... (Service Chief) reassigned complainant to another department. The Complainant claims she requested a reassignment to ..... ......, but was relocated to the 4th floor instead. 1) Is this true? Answer: Yes, the complainant requested to be moved around December 14th, 2014. I. How are you aware of this? Answer: I was able to read numerous emails between managers which those emails were obtained by the complainant’s FOIA requests of official documents. ii. Why did this person make this decision? Answer: P…..,…. (Ser
FOIA DOCS – Reprisal after EEO activity Ms. C.... (Whistleblower) made protected disclosures under the No Fear Act because she reasonably believed there were violations in law, rule, or regulation committed by her collaborating/supervisory physician/surgeon. While she made multiple reassignment/transfer requests, in order to protect herself from reprisal while she engaged in EEO activity, she was denied, ignored, and refused the option of relocation by the agency. Instead, she was forced to remain working under the very physician/surgeon who she reported on. Reprisal catapulted into a smear campaign to dismiss Ms. C… after exposing chronic violations by the physician/surgeon. Ms. C…. remained in compliance with VA policies; yet, making disclosures about the blatant violations resulted in almost eight months of reprisal, bullying, gender discrimination, and harassment. Intimidation tactics and discrediting the employee is a method by which the agency coerces the employee to resign. N
FOIA DOCS Ms. C.... made protected disclosures because she reasonably believed there were violations in law, rule, or regulation. She was retaliated against, falsely smeared, and unjustly dismissed for making protected whistleblower disclosures against a surgeon in 2014. Ms. C reported the following violations by the physician/surgeon: 1) medication mishandling; 2) stashing and re-using excess injectable meds into subsequent veterans for whom the drugs were not withdrawn; 3) failing to chart the drug name, strength, or dose he injected in the medical record in several charts; 4) committing intentional unsafe acts in the OR; 5) failing to encrypt sensitive patient data for about 5 months without the veterans ever being apprised by the agency that their data was compromised; 6) no disciplinary measures or adverse personnel actions were taken against the surgeon for chronic violations reported to the Privacy/ISO officers; and 7); the local Inspector General (IG) failed to investigate th

WELCOME!

Welcome to an anonymous site that recognizes the importance of all employees, and especially those who are faced with having to report violations in the workplace by exercising their whistleblower protection rights under the law. Ironically, much corruption exists among the bureaucracy thereby infringing on those legal protections. This blog is not to expose company names or individuals but to share experiences and have a professional exchange building on the body of knowledge. Thank you!